Argument

Objectives

  • Become conversant with terms and concepts of argumentation
  • Learn to identify strengths and weaknesses in arguments
  • Learn to write an effective claim

Resources

  • Dodds, Jack. "Argument and Persuasion." The Ready Reference Handbook. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2000. 393-410.
  • Ramage, John D., and John C. Bean. "Overview of Argument." Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998. 1-77.
  • Ramage, John D., and John C. Bean. "Principles of Argument." Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998. 79-188.
  • Ramage, John D., and John C. Bean. "Logical Fallacies." Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998. 421-434.
  • Ramage, John D., and John C. Bean. "Definition Arguments." Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998. 198-227.
  • Ramage, John D., and John C. Bean. "Causal Arguments." Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998. 228-263.

Claims

The following definitions have been adapted from The Craft of Research, by Joseph Williams, George Colomb, and Wayne Booth.

Claim: sometimes known as a thesis statement, a claim is a statement that offers an interpretation of facts. A strong argumentative claim is substantial, contestable, precise, and clear. Example: The popular music of the 1990s reflects the widespread apathy, despair, and malaise of American teenagers.

Substance: the amount of meaning and interest in a claim. To test your claim for substance, ask yourself, "Who cares?" or "What difference does it make?" Example of an insubstantial claim: The students at UNC-Pembroke have a lot of school spirit. Example of a substantial claim: The strong sense of community at UNC-Pembroke, evident in students' commitment to campus functions and organizations, challenges the prevailing characterization of Generation X as apathetic, confused, and lazy.

Contestability: the degree to which a claim is open to argument. Example of an uncontestable claim: Domestic terrorism is on the rise. Example of a contestable claim: The rise of domestic terrorism reflects a growing disillusionment with American institutions.

Precision: the degree of specificity in a claim. Example of an imprecise claim: Some people have a distorted view of Asian Americans. Example of a precise claim: Stereotypical characterizations in movies and television shows in the last decade have given many Americans a distorted impression of Asian-Americans as bookish, overly serious workaholics.

Clarity: the effectiveness of a claim in communicating a particular interpretation. Example of an unclear claim: The rise of the computer has implemented a dramatic effect. Example of a clear claim: The dramatic increase in the use of computers in business, where they have replaced many unskilled workers, has increased the importance of a college education for people who wish to obtain secure, high-paying jobs.

Terms

  • ad hominem
  • argument
  • begging the question
  • claim
  • convention
  • deduction
  • ethos
  • evidence
  • false dilemma
  • induction
  • logical fallacy
  • logos
  • pathos
  • post hoc
  • qualifier
  • rebuttal
  • red herring
  • rhetoric
  • warrant

Suggestions for Practice

  1. Logical Fallacies: Identify logical fallacies you have encountered in listening to political debate, advertisements, or other forms of argument.
  2. Writing Working Claims: Using your research as a guide, write three "working claims" for your research paper. Under each one, sketch a list of supporting materials for this argumentative claim. Choose one of these working claims and revise it until it is substantive, contestable, precise, and clear.

Updated January 5, 2000 | University of North Carolina at Pembroke
© Mark Canada, 2000 | canada@sassette.uncp.edu

Return to Be Your Best